From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: WIP partial replication patch |
Date: | 2010-08-14 06:40:24 |
Message-ID: | 4C663A58.8060502@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund írta:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> Tom Lane írta:
>>
>>> Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>> attached is a WIP patch that will eventually implement
>>>> partial replication, with the following syntax:
>>>>
>>> This fundamentally cannot work, as it relies on system catalogs to be
>>> valid during recovery.
>>>
>> Just like Hot Standby, no? What is the difference here?
>> Sorry for being ignorant.
>>
> In HS you can only connect after youve found a restartpoint - only
> after that you know that you have reached a consistent point for the
> system.
>
And in this patch, the startup process only tries to connect
after signalling the postmaster that a consistent state is reached.
And the connection has a reasonable timeout built in.
> I think this is fixable by keeping more wal on the standby's but I
> need to think more about it.
>
> Andres
>
>
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-08-14 07:05:30 | Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept |
Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-08-14 04:50:58 | Re: BUG #5608: array_agg() consumes too much memory |