From: | Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Round Robin Reviewers <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function |
Date: | 2010-08-07 15:38:06 |
Message-ID: | 4C5D7DDE.5070408@mlfowler.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On 06/08/10 20:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2010-08-06 at 09:04 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
>> If the patch is to be committed, does it make sense for me to refine
>> it such that it uses the new xpath internal function you extracted in
>> the xmlexists patch?
>
> Yes, you can probably shrink this patch down to about 20 lines.
>
Updated the patch so that it will apply to head and re-worked the
function to use the new xpath internal function.
Regards,
--
Mike Fowler
Registered Linux user: 379787
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
xpath_exists-4.patch | text/x-diff | 11.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Fowler | 2010-08-07 15:47:17 | Re: review: xml_is_well_formed |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-07 14:36:23 | Re: gincostestimate |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-08 19:18:17 | Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-08-06 19:55:05 | Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function |