From: | Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | சிவகுமார் மா <masivakumar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MySQL versus Postgres |
Date: | 2010-08-07 13:11:29 |
Message-ID: | 4C5D5B81.8080708@iol.ie |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07/08/2010 11:24, சிவகுமார் மா wrote:
> 2010/8/7 Alban Hertroys<dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>:
>> On 7 Aug 2010, at 5:19, Sandeep Srinivasa wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on this.
>>> This is very interesting from the point-of-view of transitioning MySQL webapps to Postgres. The truth is that for a lot of people, MySQL is their first DB (because of loads of pre-existing software. Refer to my thread "Which CMS/Ecommerce/shopping cart"). When we are ready to move to PG, we are already used to the MySQL way of doing things.
>>
>
> As it was happening in the last 10 years, PostgreSQL will slowly
> gather more acceptance and MySQL will reduce in popularity down the
> years. But, we should help the process along.
>
> 1. Almost all webhosting providers have MySQL support, but PostgreSQL
> support is available from only a few who also have MySQL support.
> Hence MySQL is universal and PostgreSQL is present as also available.
>
> 2. Books.
> In a book store (where I live), technical sections have SQL, SQL
> Server, PHP and MySQL, Oracle racks. There is no PostgreSQL rack.
>
> 3. Name
> It is difficult to bring up the name in conversation.
>
> To break these circles:
>
> 1. Study a typical web hosting set up and work on supporting
> everything (Wordpress, Drupal, OS Commerce) with PostgreSQL.
> PostgreSQL only servers should be made possible.
>
> 2. Bring out more books
>
> a. Documentation is already available (PostgreSQL User Manual,
> PostgreSQL Technical Documentation). Re-package them and publish as
> books targeting different user levels.
>
> b. Cook Books can be created from the discussions in this mailing list.
>
> c. More PHP+PostgreSQL books should be created.<Professional PHP6>
> from Wrox uses PostgreSQL as the default db.
Yes, so does "Pro PHP" from Apress, though it doesn't mention PG on the
cover. There was a nice warm glow of "goes without saying..." about it,
as I remember. :-)
> 4. A pet name
> Is it possible to have a pet name which can be used in casual
> conversation easily?
"Postgres" or "PG" are the usual, AIUI.
Ray.
--
Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Tolley | 2010-08-07 13:46:56 | Re: Foreign keys and permissions oddity |
Previous Message | David Boreham | 2010-08-07 13:01:47 | Re: MySQL versus Postgres |