From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Marcelo Mas" <mmas(at)atg(dot)com(dot)uy>,<pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg |
Date: | 2010-08-06 15:37:34 |
Message-ID: | 4C5BE5EE02000025000342C7@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
"Marcelo Mas" <mmas(at)atg(dot)com(dot)uy> wrote:
> Valgrind reports memmory leak when getting decimal data.
I wonder how much overlap there is between this and the patch for
fixing ECPG memory leaks offered by Zoltán Böszörményi three days
ago. There was much discussion about the dynamic UPDATE/DELETE
WHERE CURRENT OF patch, but I don't remember any discussion of the
other patch included in the same post.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg00115.php
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-08-06 17:22:19 | Re: BUG #5605: round(attr_name,int) works bad |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-06 15:25:15 | Re: BUG #5606: DEFERRABLE and DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED are the same |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-06 16:08:59 | Re: refactoring comment.c |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-08-06 15:36:17 | Re: refactoring comment.c |