From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hardik Belani <hardikbelani(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres as Historian |
Date: | 2010-08-04 00:10:57 |
Message-ID: | 4C58B011.3060001@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hardik Belani wrote:
> For this i can create a table with number and time (may be time offset
> instead of timestamp) as columns. But still it will require me to
> store huge number of rows in the order of few millions. Data is read
> only and only inserts can happen. But I need to perform all kinds of
> aggregation to get various statistics. for example: daily avg, monthly
> avg etc..
>
You've unfortunately asked on the wrong list about this. pgsql-hackers
is intended mainly for discussion related to the source code of
PostgreSQL, so this is off-topic for it. The people who like to argue
about the best way to implement aggregates and the like are on the
pgsql-performance list. You'd be more likely to get detailed responses
if you asked this question there. That group loves to talk about how to
design things for other people.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-08-04 02:44:05 | Re: GROUPING SETS revisited |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-03 23:52:18 | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |