Re: Connection pooling for a mixture of lightweight and heavyweight jobs?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Craig James" <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Connection pooling for a mixture of lightweight and heavyweight jobs?
Date: 2010-07-30 17:37:13
Message-ID: 4C52C7790200002500033F1C@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> wrote:

>> Well, the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" rule might come into
>> play here.
>
> I should have given one more detail here: We've been the victim
> of persistent "CPU spikes" that were discussed extensively in
> postgres-performance. Tom suggested upgrading to 8.4.4, but that
> can't happen for a couple more months (we're working on it).
>
>
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-04/msg00071.php

Ah, I hadn't connected that thread with this. After rereading that
thread with the information from this thread in mind, I think what
you describe on the other thread could well be the "thundering herd"
problem. Some form of connection pooling could well help.

BTW, I hope you've updated to the latest 8.3.x by now. If not, you
should expedite that.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2010-07-30 17:49:56 Re: Connection pooling for a mixture of lightweight and heavyweight jobs?
Previous Message Craig James 2010-07-30 17:09:44 Re: Connection pooling for a mixture of lightweight and heavyweight jobs?