Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option
Date: 2010-07-23 13:38:09
Message-ID: 4C499B41.60609@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Christensen escreveu:
> Like I said in the original submission, I found it helpful for the programmatic configuration of a number of simultaneous node, but if it's not generally useful to the community at large, I'll understand if it's punted.
>
I'm afraid it is the only use case for this new option. If it is, it doesn't
deserve a new option. We can live with echo + initdb for those cases.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-07-23 13:40:35 Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-07-23 13:36:52 Re: security label support, part.2