From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table |
Date: | 2010-07-22 08:35:44 |
Message-ID: | 4C4802E0.50704@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-performance |
On 22/07/10 03:27, Greg Smith wrote:
> Steve Atkins wrote:
>> If http://postgresql.org/docs/9.0/* were to 302 redirect to
>> http://postgresql.org/docs/current/* while 9.0 is the current release
>> (and similarly for 9.1 and so on) I suspect we'd find many more links
>> to current and fewer links to specific versions after a year or two.
>
> True, but this would leave people with no way to bookmark a permanent
> link to whatever is the current version, which will represent a
> regression for how some people want the site to work.
Having a quick look at the website, a simple change might be to have a
large "CURRENT MANUALS" link above all the versioned links. That should
help substantially.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-07-22 09:09:21 | Re: [PERFORM] Using more tha one index per table |
Previous Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2010-07-22 06:35:43 | Re: ECPG Documentation Improvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philippe Rimbault | 2010-07-22 08:57:58 | Re: Strange explain on partitioned tables |
Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2010-07-22 08:16:37 | Re: why index is not working in < operation? |