Re: SHOW TABLES

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SHOW TABLES
Date: 2010-07-15 17:36:33
Message-ID: 4C3F00D10200002500033662@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> I think you guys are talking past each other.

So it would appear. I was replying to a comment by Simon which
sounded to me as though he didn't feel any further discussion was
needed.

> I believe Kevin was in fact stating that we needed to continue
> discussion.

Right, and judging from Simon's reply, we have no disagreement on
that. Sorry for the confusion.

I still think that the ability to issue one request and get back a
series of responses, each of which could be the result of RAISE or a
SELECT, would be valuable, and would be the best way to implement
this; but of course it would be totally insane to try to burden
Simon's proposal with such a requirement. I was hoping that someone
had something in the works, close to fruition, which could be set as
a prerequisite for Simon's feature -- so that it could be done in
the best possible manner. The current alternatives of a separate
request for each related bit of information versus a bunch of text
lines makes me a bit queasy. Formated text (XML, YAML, etc.) seems
worse than either of the above.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-15 17:47:31 Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-07-15 17:26:48 Re: SHOW TABLES