Re: standard_conforming_strings

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-07-15 05:30:46
Message-ID: 4C3E9D06.5070608@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
>>> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ...
>>
>> "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
>> cycles on it."
>
> Should we do this? Patch attached.

Any reason not to add a line to the 9.0 docs/release notes saying
"WARNING: The PGDG currently plan to change this setting's default in 9.1"?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2010-07-15 06:58:01 Re: cvs to git migration - keywords
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-07-15 03:57:08 Re: Per-column collation, proof of concept