Re: performance on new linux box

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Ryan Wexler <ryan(at)iridiumsuite(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance on new linux box
Date: 2010-07-13 23:26:09
Message-ID: 4C3CF611.1090702@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 07/11/2010 03:02 PM, Ryan Wexler wrote:

>
> Well I got me a new raid card, MegaRAID 8708EM2, fully equipped with
> BBU and read and write caching are enabled. It completely solved my
> performance problems. Now everything is way faster than the previous
> server. Thanks for all the help everyone.
>
> One question I do have is this card has a setting called Read Policy
> which apparently helps with sequentially reads. Do you think that is
> something I should enable?
>
>
>

I would think it depends on your usage. If you use clustered indexes (and understand how/when they help) then enabling it would help (cuz clustered is assuming sequential reads).

or if you seq scan a table, it might help (as long as the table is stored relatively close together).

But if you have a big db, that doesnt fit into cache, and you bounce all over the place doing seeks, I doubt it'll help.

-Andy

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2010-07-14 01:07:50 Re: Queries with conditions using bitand operator
Previous Message Andy Colson 2010-07-13 23:19:20 Re: Queries with conditions using bitand operator