From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Bartley <ambartley(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Redundant database objects. |
Date: | 2010-07-13 06:35:36 |
Message-ID: | 4C3C0938.509@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07/12/2010 11:07 PM, Andrew Bartley wrote:
>
> I still need some way of finding redundant functions
A bit of a blunt instrument, but you could log all statements for a
while, and then grep through the logs using a list of all functions of
interest to see which ones never show up. Be wary of the performance hit
and rapidly growing log though. Another idea would be to modify a copy
of 8.3.x source code (I think that's what you said you were on in an
earlier post) to emit a NOTICE with a name whenever a function is called
if it meets some criteria.
Joe
--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2010-07-13 06:40:31 | Re: Testing 9.0beta3 and pg_upgrade |
Previous Message | Andras Fabian | 2010-07-13 06:31:18 | Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ?? |