From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need help in performance tuning. |
Date: | 2010-07-09 09:53:47 |
Message-ID: | 4C36F1AB.8090609@postnewspapers.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> Otherwise I'm wondering if PostgreSQL will begin really suffering in
> performance on workloads where queries are big and expensive but there
> are relatively few of them running at a time.
Oh, I should note at this point that I'm *not* whining that "someone"
should volunteer to do this, or that "the postgresql project" should
just "make it happen".
I'm fully aware that Pg is a volunteer project and that even if these
speculations were in a vaguely reasonable direction, that doesn't mean
anyone has the time/skills/knowledge/interest to undertake such major
architectural change. I certainly know I have zero right to ask/expect
anyone to - I'm very, very grateful to all those who already spend time
helping out and enhancing Pg. With particular props to Tom Lane for
patience on the -general list and heroic bug-fixing persistence.
Sorry for the rely-to-self, I just realized my post could've been taken
as a whine about Pg's architecture and some kind of demand that someone
do something about it. That couldn't be further from my intent.
--
Craig Ringer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | damien hostin | 2010-07-09 10:13:27 | Re: Slow query with planner row strange estimation |
Previous Message | Jayadevan M | 2010-07-09 09:47:14 | Queries about PostgreSQL PITR |