Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Richard Yen" <richyen(at)iparadigms(dot)com>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?
Date: 2010-07-08 20:14:26
Message-ID: 4C35EB520200002500033294@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Richard Yen <richyen(at)iparadigms(dot)com> wrote:

> When you say "bulk-loaded," I suppose that also includes loading
> the data via slony ADD NODE as well--correct?

I would think so. Anything which loads a lot of data in relatively
few database transactions would qualify; I would think slony would
do this, as it's generally required to get decent performance.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-07-08 20:22:07 Re: Need help in performance tuning.
Previous Message Richard Yen 2010-07-08 20:06:34 Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum?