From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Cannot cancel the change of a tablespace |
Date: | 2010-07-01 09:30:57 |
Message-ID: | 4C2C6051.1060504@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le 30/06/2010 06:53, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 30/06/2010 05:25, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> So this is not something we want fixed for 9.0, as indicated by Simon?
>>>> I don't see the patch on the commit-fest page yet.
>>
>>> I tend to think we should fix it for 9.0, but could be talked out of
>>> it if someone has a compelling argument to make.
>>
>> Er, maybe I lost count, but I thought you were the one objecting to
>> the patch.
>>
>
> You're right. Robert questioned the use of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in
> code available in the src/port directory. I don't see what issue could
> result with this. He also said that whatever would be commited should be
> back-patched.
>
> I can still add it for the next commit fest, I just don't want this
> patch to get lost. Though I won't be able to do this before getting back
> from work.
>
Finally, I added it to the next commit fest. Robert can work on it
before if he wants to (or has the time).
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=331
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-07-01 11:27:57 | Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers |
Previous Message | Pavel Golub | 2010-07-01 05:59:29 | Re: Keepalives win32 |