| From: | Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Gerd Koenig <koenig(at)transporeon(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgpool |
| Date: | 2010-06-21 17:44:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4C1FA512.1090907@serioustechnology.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> If you want to be able to connect on various databases from various
> servers, pgBouncer is what you're looking for.
It does not appear that pgbouncer will 'limit exceeding connections' as
does pgpool. So if I have a pool of 20 connections and 20 connections
are used, what happens to the 21st connection attempt? Is it rejected
or put into a queue to wait for the next available connection?
--
Until later, Geoffrey
"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brad Nicholson | 2010-06-21 17:55:36 | Re: A thought about other open source projects |
| Previous Message | Davor J. | 2010-06-21 17:13:17 | Re: Optimizer: ranges and partial indices? Or use partitioning? |