Re: extensible enum types

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Peter Geoghegan" <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: extensible enum types
Date: 2010-06-21 17:04:45
Message-ID: 4C1F555D020000250003270F@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> In my experience, lookup tables generally have two columns, an
> integer PK and a description/state.

Eek. If that's what you consider a lookup table, I wouldn't
advocate their use for anything. Ever. Period.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-06-21 17:11:33 Re: extensible enum types
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-21 17:04:17 Re: deprecating =>, take two