From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ticket 186: Reseting a table/function's statistics |
Date: | 2010-06-18 21:55:10 |
Message-ID: | 4C1BEB3E.8010502@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 18/06/2010 22:59, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> [...]
>> PS: of course, I won't commit until we branch out 1.12.
>
> I think I've given up on my desire to have a sequential commit
> reference for QA's benefit. We should figure out how we can move to
> GIT withut breaking the back branches which currently still use that.
>
I don't get it. What are you afraid of breaking? the sequential commit
reference will break for everything, back branches and trunk.
> Doing so would make this sort of work easier....
>
As a matter of fact, it'll make it easier. But it's already not that
hard. I just keep it in a separate branch, and merging is really easy
with git. Moreover, I don't intend to work on a lot of patches till we
branch. This one was just a warm-up. I'll now work on a better i18n. And
then, exclusion constraint and SQL/Med objects. Which would already be
great to have in mid-august.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-06-18 22:08:45 | Re: Ticket 186: Reseting a table/function's statistics |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-06-18 20:59:36 | Re: Ticket 186: Reseting a table/function's statistics |