From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
Date: | 2010-06-17 20:39:32 |
Message-ID: | 4C1A8804.30009@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Since there are no other votes for that option (or, indeed, any other
> option), I'm going to go with my original instinct and change hstore
> => text[] to hstore & text[]. Patch to do that is attached.
If what that operator is doing is appending an array of text to an
Hstore, shouldn't we use || instead?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-17 20:40:12 | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2010-06-17 20:30:24 | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |