Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't know what to do about this
This probably is out of the question for 9.0 based on scale of
change, and maybe forever based on the impact of WAL volume, but --
if we logged "before" images along with the "after", we could undo
the work of the "over-eager" transactions on the slave upon
reconnect.
-Kevin