Re: GUC category cleanup

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC category cleanup
Date: 2010-06-15 06:05:30
Message-ID: 4C17182A.4070500@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15/06/10 08:09, Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>
> Fujii Masao<masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>>> What's the policy with that, should all the sections in the sample config
>>> file and docs have a corresponding enum in config_group_names?
>>
>> +1. This seems sensible.
>
> Here is a patch to do that. I used terms in the documentation for category
> names. Also, some uncategorized variables moved into detailed groups.

Thanks, looks good to me.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-06-15 07:08:18 Re: [v9.1] Add security hook on initialization of instance
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-06-15 05:41:10 Re: InvalidXLogRecPtr in docs