From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GUC category cleanup |
Date: | 2010-06-15 06:05:30 |
Message-ID: | 4C17182A.4070500@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15/06/10 08:09, Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>
> Fujii Masao<masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>>> What's the policy with that, should all the sections in the sample config
>>> file and docs have a corresponding enum in config_group_names?
>>
>> +1. This seems sensible.
>
> Here is a patch to do that. I used terms in the documentation for category
> names. Also, some uncategorized variables moved into detailed groups.
Thanks, looks good to me.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-06-15 07:08:18 | Re: [v9.1] Add security hook on initialization of instance |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-15 05:41:10 | Re: InvalidXLogRecPtr in docs |