Re: pg_archive_bypass

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL <Pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_archive_bypass
Date: 2010-06-14 11:44:21
Message-ID: 4C161615.8090204@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14/06/10 13:39, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> I tend to consider it a bug that there's no known way under windows to
> use the same trick as under Unix by using '/usr/bin/true' as your
> archive command. And this Unix trick itself does feel like a hack.
>
> Also I'd very much like to be able to recommend (even if not change the
> official defaults) to setup wal_level to archive, archive_mode=on and
> archive_command=pg_archive_bypass, so that the day you have a HA budget
> ain't the day you're going to restart the server to enable the fault
> tolerance settings…

That particular use case is better handled by making archive_mode
changeable on-the-fly. Now that we have wal_level as a separate GUC, it
shouldn't be too hard.

I like internal commands as a solution in general, but it's still in
search of a problem..

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-14 11:46:19 Re: GSoC - Materialized Views - is stale or fresh?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-14 11:42:55 Re: warning message in standby