Re: Partitioning on the date part of a timestamp & PK issues

From: Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning on the date part of a timestamp & PK issues
Date: 2021-07-15 20:17:56
Message-ID: 4C13EFB8-F25D-4361-817B-DA997FB15912@jakobs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Am 15. Juli 2021 22:10:01 MESZ schrieb Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>I have a table like so:
>
>CREATE TABLE t (
> guid uuid not null,
> seq smallint not null,
> tid smallint not null,
> ts timestamp without time zone not null,
> x real,
> y real,
> z real,
> primary key (guid, tid, seq)
>) partition by range (extract(date from ts));
>
>Which results in the error:
>
>ERROR: unsupported PRIMARY KEY constraint with partition key
>definition
>DETAIL: PRIMARY KEY constraints cannot be used when partition keys
>include
>expressions.
>
>Is there a suitable way to get around this? I can make an additional
>date
>col in the table to use for the partition range, but given the amount
>of
>data we will have, I am trying to be cognizant of storage concerns.
>
>The PK is the PK, so I'm not sure what options I have there.
>
>Thanks.
>
>--
>Wells Oliver
>wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>

--
Maybe you could sister separate date and time and use date as partition key. The timestamp column could be generated in a view as datecol + timecol.

If new data is entered, it could be separated into the two columns via trigger.

Haven't tried it, bit seems feasible.

Regards,
Holger

--
Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach
+49 178 9759012
- sent from mobile, therefore short -

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2021-07-15 20:30:10 Re: Partitioning on the date part of a timestamp & PK issues
Previous Message Wells Oliver 2021-07-15 20:10:01 Partitioning on the date part of a timestamp & PK issues