Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: "Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <solaiyappan(dot)pr(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Date: 2010-06-11 12:38:20
Message-ID: 4C122E3C.5060003@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 19:56 +0800, Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
> wrote:
>> Also, is there any synchronous replication patch planned for the
>> PostgreSQL 9.0 version?
>
> Cybertec announced new version of Cybercluster, which includes sync
> replication -- I haven't tested it though.

that one is basically 9.0beta + the sync rep patch posted on the list -
not something you would want to use in production...

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-06-11 13:14:49 Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Previous Message Andrea Suisani 2010-06-11 12:35:41 Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline