From: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Jarvis <thangalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Analysis Function |
Date: | 2010-06-11 02:11:10 |
Message-ID: | 4C119B3E.3090608@squeakycode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 06/10/2010 07:41 PM, David Jarvis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a slow part of the query:
>
> SELECT
> * date(extract(YEAR FROM m.taken)||'-1-1') d1,*
> * date(extract(YEAR FROM m.taken)||'-1-31') d2*
> FROM
> climate.city c,
> climate.station s,
> climate.station_category sc,
> climate.measurement m
> WHERE
> c.id <http://c.id> = 5148 AND ...
>
> Date extraction is 3.2 seconds, but without is 1.5 seconds. The PL/pgSQL
> code that actually runs (where p_month1, p_day1, and p_month2, p_day2
> are integers):
>
> * date(extract(YEAR FROM
> m.taken)||''-'||p_month1||'-'||p_day1||''') d1,
> date(extract(YEAR FROM
> m.taken)||''-'||p_month2||'-'||p_day2||''') d2
> *
> What is a better way to create those dates (without string
> concatenation, I presume)?
>
> Dave
>
I assume you are doing this in a loop? Many Many Many times? cuz:
andy=# select date(extract(year from current_date) || '-1-1');
date
------------
2010-01-01
(1 row)
Time: 0.528 ms
Its pretty quick. You say "without" its 1.5 seconds? Thats all you change? Can we see the sql and 'explain analyze' for both?
-Andy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anj Adu | 2010-06-11 02:54:01 | Re: slow query performance |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-11 00:49:48 | Re: slow query performance |