From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: InvalidXLogRecPtr in docs |
Date: | 2010-06-10 07:00:46 |
Message-ID: | 4C108D9E.2000502@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/06/10 05:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
>> <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> I found a term "InvalidXLogRecPtr" in 9.0 docs.
>>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-RECOVERY-INFO-TABLE
>>> | ... then the return value will be InvalidXLogRecPtr (0/0).
>
>> Maybe we should be returning NULL instead of 0/0.
>
> +1 for using NULL instead of an artificially chosen value, for both of
> those functions.
Agreed, committed a patch to do that.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-10 07:07:13 | Re: InvalidXLogRecPtr in docs |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-06-10 06:42:35 | Re: InvalidXLogRecPtr in docs |