Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, alvherre <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-27 01:06:17
Message-ID: 4BFDC589.1080507@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27/05/10 03:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> Being compatible with the SQL
> standard and with Oracle is not to be taken lightly.

I seem to be alone believing that the SQL standard doesn't say anything
about named function parameters. Can someone point me to the relevant
section of the standard?

As evidence to the contrary:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg00558.php

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-27 01:06:53 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2010-05-27 01:02:49 exporting raw parser