From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages |
Date: | 2010-05-22 15:14:44 |
Message-ID: | 4BF7F4E4.2040106@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Somebody (I think Joe or Heikki) poked a big hole in this last night at
> the Royal Oak. Although the scheme would get rid of the need to replace
> old XIDs with FrozenXid, it does not get rid of the need to set hint
> bits before you can truncate CLOG. So in your example of an insert-only
> table that's probably never read again, there's still a minimum of one
> update visit required on every old page. Now that's still better than
> two update visits ... but we could manage that already, just by tweaking
> vacuum's heuristics about when to freeze vs when to set hint bits.
Yeah, someone pointed that out to me too and suggested that a freeze map
was the better solution. I still think there's something we can do with
pages on the visibility map but I'll have to think about it some more.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Bunce | 2010-05-22 18:07:59 | Re: release notes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-22 13:35:29 | Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages |