From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
Date: | 2010-05-14 21:51:18 |
Message-ID: | 4BEDC5D6.6030800@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> This would be OK as long as we document it well. We patched the
>> shutdown the way we did specifically because Fujii thought it would be
>> an easy fix; if it's complicated, we should revert it and document the
>> issue for DBAs.
>
> I don't understand this comment.
In other words, I'm saying that it's not critical that we troubleshoot
this for 9.0. Revering Fujii's patch, if it's not working, is an option.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Crabtree | 2010-05-14 21:52:02 | Re: Generating Lots of PKs with nextval(): A Feature Proposal |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-14 21:32:15 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |