| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Date: | 2010-05-07 17:56:13 |
| Message-ID: | 4BE4543D.8010309@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
> I never meant to suggest any statement in that section is factually
> wrong; it's just all too rosy, leading people to believe it's no big
> deal to turn it off.
Yeah, that section is overdue for an update. I'll write some new text
and post it to pgsql-docs.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2010-05-07 23:32:59 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-05-07 14:48:53 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-05-07 18:07:15 | Two C-interface issues on -Testers |
| Previous Message | Steve Crawford | 2010-05-07 17:53:10 | Re: what is good solution for support NULL inside string_to_array function? |