| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: missing file in git repo |
| Date: | 2010-04-30 12:05:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4BDAC7A6.30301@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Cédric Villemain wrote:
> 2010/4/30 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>:
>> I don't think the git repo was ever considered working for the backbranches
>> at all...
>
> Really ?!
> Then we have to remove the backbranches from the git.
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git#Using_Back_Branches
Yeah, or fix them.
FWIW, REL8_4_STABLE and REL8_3_STABLE are working, I just compared them
against CVS checkouts. REL8_2_STABLE is not, it's missing a
security-related patch from December. I didn't check the other branches.
I have nothing against dropping the older branches, but please keep at
least REL8_4_STABLE, I use it frequently.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-30 12:08:11 | Re: Invalidating dependent views and functions |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-30 11:58:56 | Re: failed assertion and panic in standby mode |