From: | Rene Schickbauer <rene(dot)schickbauer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance impact of hundreds of partitions |
Date: | 2010-04-21 12:56:33 |
Message-ID: | 4BCEF601.1010909@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Leonardo F wrote:
> Is it mainly a planning problem or an execution time problem?
I have here a database with a table partitioned across 400 sub-tables.
I'm using a trigger-based solution with constraint exclusion. The thing
that takes the longest is planning queries. I made THAT problem just go
away for the most part by using cached queries (only works within the
same database connection, but thats no problem for me).
I also tried a rule-based partitioning, that indeed breaks down quickly
performance wise.
Also, the trigger is a ON INSERT AND UPDATE, and only on the main table.
If your main insert/update process knows into which partition to insert,
you can speed that up even more; while still beeing able to use the
automated partitioning for everything else.
LG
Rene
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-04-21 13:17:41 | Re: unable to start postgresql server services (Windows XP/Professional/Service Pack3) |
Previous Message | Andre Lopes | 2010-04-21 12:41:25 | Re: Database viewpoint of subject - Sending e-mails from database table with Cronjob |