| From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | SpinLockAcquire question |
| Date: | 2010-04-20 13:46:26 |
| Message-ID: | 4BCDB032.8090403@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
is there a danger in using SpinLockAcquire() in
a signal handler? I mean if e.g. a spinlock is already
taken by the process and a signal comes that's handler
wants to execute SpinLockAcquire() again, does it
lock up or simply increases the lock counter?
Thanks in advance,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-20 13:47:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-20 13:42:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |