Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items
Date: 2010-04-16 09:06:23
Message-ID: 4BC8288F.8030203@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> We have the emode_for_corrupt_record() function that's used in all the
>> errors that indicate a corrupt WAL record, that's a perfect place to
>> hook this into. See attached patch.
>
> The test for elog == LOG seems a bit fragile to me - why that
> specifically? Maybe elog < PANIC? elog > DEBUG1? Both?

Suppressing anything >= ERROR wouldn't make sense, as ERRORs cause the
replay to abort. I didn't want to affect WARNINGs either, which indicate
that something is truly wrong. The only level left between DEBUG1, which
is what the message is downgraded to, and WARNING, is LOG.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-16 09:10:01 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-04-16 09:00:30 Re: Remaining Streaming Replication Open Items