Re: Complete row is fetched ?

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Complete row is fetched ?
Date: 2010-04-16 07:07:41
Message-ID: 4BC80CBD.7070703@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

A. Kretschmer wrote:
> In response to Satish Burnwal (sburnwal) :
>
>> I have a ques - say I have a table that has 10 columns. But in a simple
>> select query from that table, I use just 3 columns. I want to know
>> whether even for fetching 3 columns, read happens for all the 10 columns
>> and out of that the required 3 columns are returned ? ie Does the
>> complete row with all the 10 columns are fetched even though I need just
>> 3 columns ? OR only 3 columns are fetched ?
>>
>
> Depends, large columns (TEXT, BYTA) are TOASTed¹, that means, the content
> of this columns stored in a other table. So it is always a good idea to
> specify all rows you needed and don't use select *.
>
> ¹ http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/storage-toast.html
>
Another reason to prefer explicit column lists over SELECT * for queries
on relations with a lot of columsn and rows, is that it enables some
plan nodes to be more economical with memory, see e.g. comment of
'disuse_physical_tlist':

/*
* disuse_physical_tlist
* Switch a plan node back to emitting only Vars actually referenced.
*
* If the plan node immediately above a scan would prefer to get only
* needed Vars and not a physical tlist, it must call this routine to
* undo the decision made by use_physical_tlist(). Currently, Hash, Sort,
* and Material nodes want this, so they don't have to store useless columns.
*/

regards,
Yeb Havinga

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2010-04-16 08:18:45 Re: Complete row is fetched ?
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-04-16 06:50:58 Re: readline library not found