Re: auto vacuum

From: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)unicell(dot)co(dot)il>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com
Subject: Re: auto vacuum
Date: 2010-04-14 17:09:55
Message-ID: 4BC5F6E3.9040509@unicell.co.il
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

First, I'd like to thank Bill and Alvaro as well as you for your replies.

Quoting Tom Lane:
> Hmm. Given the churn rate on the table, I'm having a very hard time
> believing that you don't need to vacuum it pretty dang often. Maybe the
> direction you need to be moving is to persuade autovac to vacuum it
> *more* often, not less often, so that the time needed to finish each
> vacuum is small enough.
>
Other than reclaiming disk space, is there any advantage to vacuum? Is a
vacuumed table more efficient? So far, every time it vacuums - which is
around every 15-20 minutes under load conditions - it slows down
processing. I think perhaps Bill's suggestion of just scheduling the
vacuums myself (e.g. 1-2am, off peak) coupled with cost-based vacuuming
might be a good answer? Unless I'm missing an important point about
vacuuming.

Alvaro and Bill both suggested scheduling analyzes on a minute-by-minute
cron. Would this be no different than automatic analyze? No extra
overhead for connection, perhaps?

Thanks,
Herouth

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-04-14 17:14:59 Re: pl/java status
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-04-14 16:54:28 Re: autoscale cluster