From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Missing RULEs from VIEWs and their format |
Date: | 2010-04-10 08:09:11 |
Message-ID: | 4BC03227.6080600@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 09/04/2010 15:03, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
> On 08.04.2010 22:38, guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info wrote:
>> Le 07/04/2010 19:47, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit :
>>
>>> [...]
>>> I have just filed ticket #167 concerning missing RULEs with VIEWs.
>>> On a related but less important note: the formatting of rules might be
>>> improved if was done like triggers are:
>>>
>>> -- status quo
>>> CREATE OR REPLACE RULE on_delete AS
>>> ON DELETE TO test DO INSTEAD DELETE FROM test2
>>> WHERE test2.id = old.id;
>>>
>>> -- proposal
>>> CREATE OR REPLACE RULE on_delete AS
>>> ON DELETE
>>> TO test
>>> DO INSTEAD
>>> DELETE FROM test2
>>> WHERE test2.id = old.id;
>>>
>>>
>> Hummm, /me feels ashamed but happy to see you came back with so many bug
>> reports and feature requests :)
>>
>
> Hey, Guillaume, I have made notes over the last couple of months, but
> never got around to report - for all the work piling on my desktop.
Oh, great.
> And I do try to verify my findings before reporting. Wouldn't be much
> help, if I provided noise instead of insight, right?
Right :)
> So, the accumulation of reports is much rather a sign of bad timing on
> my side than of quality issues.
>
No problem.
Anyways, this is fixed. Thanks for your report.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-04-10 08:58:44 | Re: Maintenance form exection thread |
Previous Message | pgAdmin Trac | 2010-04-10 07:50:50 | Re: [pgAdmin III] #167: Missing RULEs for VIEWs in SQL pane |