From: | "Anjan Dave" <adave(at)vantage(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Subbiah, Stalin" <SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com>, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Date: | 2004-03-23 18:53:48 |
Message-ID: | 4BAFBB6B9CC46F41B2AD7D9F4BBAF7850980A8@vt-pe2550-001.vantage.vantage.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
What bus speeds?
533MHz on the 32-bit Intel will give you about 4.2Gbps of IO throughput...
I think the Sun will be 150MHz, 64bit is 2.4Gbps of IO. Correct me if i am wrong.
Thanks,
Anjan
-----Original Message-----
From: Subbiah, Stalin [mailto:SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com]
Sent: Tue 3/23/2004 1:40 PM
To: 'Andrew Sullivan'; 'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Cc:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
We are looking into Sun V210 (2 x 1 GHz cpu, 2 gig ram, 5.8Os) vs. Dell 1750
(2 x 2.4 GHz xeon, 2 gig ram, RH3.0). database will mostly be
write intensive and disks will be on raid 10. Wondering if 64bit 1 GHz to
32bit 2.4 GHz make a big difference here.
Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Andrew
Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:37 AM
To: 'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:05:45PM -0800, Subbiah, Stalin wrote:
> being the key performance booster for postgres. what is the preferred OS
> for postgres deployment if given an option between linux and solaris. As
One thing this very much depends on is what you're trying to do.
Suns have a reputation for greater reliability. While my own
experience with Sun hardware has been rather shy of sterling, I _can_
say that it stands head and shoulders above a lot of the x86 gear you
can get.
If you're planning to use Solaris on x86, don't bother. Solaris is a
slow, bloated pig compared to Linux, at least when it comes to
managing the largish number of processes that Postgres requires.
If pure speed is what you're after, I have found that 2-way, 32 bit
Linux on P-IIIs compares very favourably to 4 way 64 bit Ultra SPARC
IIs.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the
marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2004-03-23 19:17:09 | Re: Help with query plan inconsistencies |
Previous Message | Matt Clark | 2004-03-23 18:51:43 | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |