From: | "Anjan Dave" <adave(at)vantage(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jeff" <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is this system swapping? |
Date: | 2005-04-27 20:55:32 |
Message-ID: | 4BAFBB6B9CC46F41B2AD7D9F4BBAF785026FF734@vt-pe2550-001.vantage.vantage.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Using Resin's connection pooling. We are looking into pgpool alongside
slony to separate some reporting functionality.
-anjan
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff [mailto:threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:29 PM
To: Greg Stark
Cc: Anjan Dave; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Why is this system swapping?
On Apr 27, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> "AI would seriously look at tuning those connection pools down. A lot.
> If your
> server processes are sitting idle over half the time I would at least
> cut it
> by a factor of 2.
>
Are you (Anjan) using real or fake connection pooling - ie pgpool
versus php's persistent connections ? I'd strongly recommend looking
at pgpool. it does connection pooling correctly (A set of X connections
shared among the entire box rather than 1 per web server)
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-27 21:01:50 | Re: Joel's Performance Issues WAS : Opteron vs Xeon |
Previous Message | Anjan Dave | 2005-04-27 20:53:36 | Re: Why is this system swapping? |