From: | Ozz Nixon <ozznixon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does anyone use in ram postgres database? |
Date: | 2010-03-26 14:14:15 |
Message-ID: | 4BACC137.3040409@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 3/26/10 10:06 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Scott Marlowe<scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> These questions always get the first question back, what are you
>> trying to accomplish? Different objectives will have different
>> answers.
>>
> We have a real-time application that processes data as it comes in.
> Doing some simple math tells us that a disk-based DB cannot possible
> perform fast enough to allow us to process the data.
>
I have to ask the obvious question... as we develop solutions which must
process 100,000 queries a second. In those cases, we use a combination
hash table and link-lists. There are times where SQL is not the right
choice, it is great for simplifying indexing and locks - but prior to
SQL *we* had to write code guys... and it sounds like you too need to go
back to old-school programming techniques.
O.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Szymon Guz | 2010-03-26 14:14:48 | Re: Need help on updating an entire column with a list of values, I have. |
Previous Message | Timo Klecker | 2010-03-26 14:12:02 | Re: Need help on updating an entire column with a list of values, I have. |