| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Deadlock possibility in _bt_check_unique? |
| Date: | 2010-03-23 10:19:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4BA895C5.2080000@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote:
> Hi,
> With the implementation of deferred unique constraints, we need to go
> back to the index second time to check whether the unique check is valid.
> Say a situation occurs like this
> a) the first session doing the unique check finds out that there is a unique
> check required second time and just makes its entry and comes back
> b) the second session doing the unique check finds out that there is a
> unique check required second time and just makes its entry and comes back
>
> While they do the second check, first session will wait for the session to
> complete and vice versa. Won't this result in a deadlock? Isn't this a
> realistic scenario?
Yes, that can happen. The deadlock detector will kick in and abort one
of the sessions.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2010-03-23 13:08:24 | Re: Deadlock possibility in _bt_check_unique? |
| Previous Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2010-03-23 09:53:43 | Deadlock possibility in _bt_check_unique? |