Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code

On 21/03/2010 10:33 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/3/21 Craig Ringer<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>:
>> On 21/03/2010 8:03 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Current form of function detail isn't too practical (see screenshot 1)
>>>
>>> we can move source code to separate area (maybe we can add rownumbers)
>>>
>>> see screenshot 2 (it is only mockup, real implementation can be more
>>> inteligent in rows numbering)
>>
>> Ideally, the output of the source listing could be used as input to CREATE
>> OR REPLACE FUNCTION without excessive massaging. Those line number prefixes
>> make it hard to grab the output of \df+ and do something useful with it.
>
> there is \ef statement now

... which I completely missed. My apologies; that problem is already solved.

--
Craig Ringer