Re: stopping processes, preventing connections

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)unicell(dot)co(dot)il>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stopping processes, preventing connections
Date: 2010-03-21 11:33:19
Message-ID: 4BA603FF.8020908@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 21/03/2010 7:12 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Herouth Maoz<herouth(at)unicell(dot)co(dot)il> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The problem is not so much danger in upgrading, but the fact that doing so
>> without using the system's usual security/bugfix update path means
>> non-standard work for the sysadmin, meaning he has to upgrade every package
>> on the system using a different upgrade method, being notified about it from
>> a different source, and needing to check each one in different conditions,
>> which makes his work impossible. So the policy so far has been "Use the
>> packages available through debian". So I'll need to check if there is an
>> upgrade available through that path - and the question is whether it's
>> worthwhile (i.e. whether the bug in question has indeed been fixed).
>
> I'm certain debian keeps the pgsql packages up to date within a few
> days or at most weeks of their release .

In sid (unstable), sure. But the stable releases don't usually see major
version upgrades (like 8.3 to 8.4) unless they're done via unofficial
channels like backports.org .

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message william wayne 2010-03-21 12:05:31 Hans Samses
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-03-21 10:57:00 Re: like operation in tsearch