(2010/03/03 11:22), Tom Lane wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
>> Is it an expected behavior?
>
> There's no particular reason to forbid it, is there?
Perhaps, it is harmless.
It just seemed to me the renameatt() was not implemented correctly
according to the documentation.
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>