From: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Bart Samwel <bart(at)samwel(dot)tk>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Polyplanner (was Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.) |
Date: | 2010-03-01 11:18:01 |
Message-ID: | 4B8BA269.1060100@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
How about a totally different approach?
What if all queries and plans of all queries, simple and prepared, were
pre-planned and cached always, persistent?
For prepared statements with >= 1 parameters, histogram and mcv
information could be used to search the plan space for interesting
plans. Maybe with some heuristics to cut down on search space (i.e. when
operator is '=' and there is a unique index, skip that clause /
parameter from the search space).
Since processors keep getting more and more cores, and most database
activity is IO bound, why not keep one core busy with query analysis?
good:
- with the several hooks available it could be implemented as optional
contrib
- if offers plan stability
- nice info for management user interface
- might be a solution for prepared queries
- for queries with large joins, plans might be considered with
exhaustive search, so also here there could be an improvement.
- it might even be possible to 'test' plans during low-usage hours
bad:
- unknown how big space for cached plans should be
- if big cached plan space doesn't fit in memory, actual planning
probably better than fetching from disk, ~= 5 to 10ms.
regards,
Yeb Havinga
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-03-01 13:13:14 | Re: Linux start script updates |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2010-03-01 11:00:15 | Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L') |