Re: plperl.on_init - bug or just me?

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl.on_init - bug or just me?
Date: 2010-02-25 17:14:33
Message-ID: 4B86AFF9.9040609@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25/02/10 17:10, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Presumably "Safe" just clamps down and my
>> sub isn't marked as acceptable. Is this intended, or am I doing
>> something stupid?
>
> It's intended (at least by me).
>
> Also, please see the recent discussion about loading extra stuff into
> the Safe container.

Ah - looks like I've missed a thread.

> At the very least that has been shelved for now.
> We're going to proceed with deliberation in this area. I'm quite
> concerned to make sure that we don't provide an opportunity for people
> to undermine the behaviour of the trusted language.

Fair enough.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-02-25 17:29:44 Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-02-25 17:10:03 Re: plperl.on_init - bug or just me?