| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables |
| Date: | 2010-02-23 14:58:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4B83ED09.1010204@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote:
>
> I looked at the postgres nbtree code. From my analysis(which
> might be wrong!), we can implement IOTs, provided we make a decision
> on broken data types issue.
>
>
I am not familiar with this term "broken data types", and I just looked
for it in the source code and couldn't find it.
What exactly are you referring to?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-02-23 15:00:33 | Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-23 14:53:54 | Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core) |