Re: PostgreSQL::PLPerl::Call - Simple interface for calling SQL functions from PostgreSQL PL/Perl

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL::PLPerl::Call - Simple interface for calling SQL functions from PostgreSQL PL/Perl
Date: 2010-02-18 08:26:51
Message-ID: 4B7CF9CB.1040407@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17/02/10 18:30, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:28 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
>> Umm, perhaps F->funcname(@args), or PG->funcname(@args), or ... ?
>>
>> Anyone got any better suggestions?
>
> PG is good. Or maybe DB?

It's a module whose only use is embedded in a DB called PG - not sure
those carry any extra info. It also treads on the toes of
"PG->not_a_function" should such a beast be needed.

I like "F->funcname" or "FN->funcname" myself.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2010-02-18 08:58:41 Re: codlin_month is up and complain - PL/Python crash
Previous Message Andres Freund 2010-02-18 08:23:17 Re: Streaming replication and unfit messages