| From: | Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Arie Bikker <arie(at)abikker(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: xpath improvement V2 |
| Date: | 2010-02-17 01:25:28 |
| Message-ID: | 4B7B4588.4040706@comcast.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Urbański wrote:
> Arie Bikker wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've combined the review suggestions of Jan Urbański, Scott Bailey, and
>> others.
>> This was a lot harder, then I had foreseen; and I took my time to do it
>> the right way (hope you agree!).
>
> Hi,
>
> I see the patch has been marked as "Returned with Feedback" on the 6th
> of February, I assume on grounds of prolonged silence about it. I
> confess it was partly my fault, because soon after posting the review I
> suddenly had to focus on other things.
>
> I won't be able to review the new version in the next few days, and this
> commitfest is closing anyway... However I would hate to see that patch
> just disappear, as I think it's useful and you obviously invested some
> work in it.
>
> At this stage I would suggest moving it to the first 9.1 commitfest,
> since it's a nice feature, but not one we should burden the committers
> with this late in the development cycle.
>
> Arie, care to add that last version of the patch to the 2010-Next
> commitfest?
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
I would agree w/ Jan about just adding to 9.1 except that it fixes
several known bugs.
Scott
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-17 03:12:26 | Re: bug? autovacuum is not launched even if autovacuum_freeze_max_age is reached |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-17 00:21:07 | Re: OpenVMS? |