From: | Eric Pailleau <eric(at)numlog(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5322: Time to perform vacuums |
Date: | 2010-02-11 16:39:50 |
Message-ID: | 4B7432D6.30809@numlog.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Robert Haas a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I can see VACUUM making VACUUM FULL faster. I don't think VACUUM FULL
>> should make VACUUM FULL ANALYZE faster.
>
> Err, let me correct myself. A second VACUUM FULL should be faster
> than the first one. But the two together I wouldn't expect to be
> faster than doing it all in one shot.
>
> ...Robert
Thank you Robert for your comments.
What seems to be a bug, could be a feature ?
May be performing a simple VACUUM first before a real VACUUM FULL
can be a solution to increase VACUUM FULL performances ?
(I mean VACUUM FULL could be done in 2 sequences , first a simple VACUUM then a real VACUUM FULL).
The time difference is sometime 1 for 10 ! But it should be confirmed on other platforms and OS ...
Thanks anyway, I will stay with my three commands sequence, waiting for the new CLUSTER command...
Postgreqlement .
--
Salutations - Best regards - mit freundlichen Grüssen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-02-11 17:24:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-11 16:26:37 | Re: BUG #5322: Time to perform vacuums |